SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Ori) 5

R.N.MISRA, R.C.PATNAIK
DHUSASAN NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
DHADI NAYAK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.MOHANTY, A.PASAYAT, BIDHAYAK PATNAIK, J.PATTANAIK, N.C.PATNAIK, R.MOHAPATRA, S.K.DAV

R. N. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THE judgment-debtor in Execution Case No. 120 of 1975, levied for executing the decree in Title Suit No. 15 of 1961 in the Court of the Munsif, First Court, Cuttack, is the petitioner in both these applications under Section 115 of the Civil P. C. The final decree in the said suit allotted 4-2/63 decimals out of 11 decimals in plot No. 498 in Khata No. 60 in favour of the decree-holders. The remaining property out of the plot was to go to the judgment-debtor and some others. Execution was levied to take possession of the aforesaid portion of the plot. A Commissioner was appointed to deliver possession upon measurement. The Commissioner submitted a report to the effect that possession had been delivered. An objection was filed purporting to be under Section 47 of the Code which was registered as Misc. Case No. 34 of 1978 challenging the Commissioner's report and contending that delivery of possession of excess land had been effected. By order dated 28-6-79, the Executing Court accepted the Commissioner's report and reflected the prayer for deputing another Commissioner. Civil Revision No. 699 of 1979 is filed against that order.

( 2 ) THE Executing Court inde











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top