SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Ori) 57

P.C.MISRA
KANTARU SAHU – Appellant
Versus
DHARMA SAHU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.V.Ramdas, R.MOHANTY, SANJIT MOHANTY

P. C. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) DEFENDANTS 1 to 3 have preferred this appeal against the confirming judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge, Aska. in a suit for recovery of possession, mesne profits and damages.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff's case, briefly stated, is that he purchased Ac. 0. 24 cents of land in Survey No. 169 from one Dasa Naik and Ac. 0. 26 cents of land in Survey No. 254 from one Ulla Sahu and others under two separate registered sale deeds dated 19-10-65 and 9-5-69, respectively Exts. 2 and 3. The plaintiff has alleged that after purchasing the said land he was in peaceful possession thereof till the month of May, 1970 when the defendants encroached upon different portions of these lands by removing the intervening ridges. According to him, defendant 1 has encroached upon Ac. 0. 04 cents of land from the south-east portion of Survey No. 169 and defendant 2 has encroached upon Ac. 0. 02 cents from the north of the said plot and defendants 2 and 3 together have encroached upon Ac. 0. 02 cents of land from out of Survey No. 254 while defendant 4 has encroached upon Ac. 0. 02 cents of land from the north of the said plot. As the defendants did not vacate the suit lands in spite of













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top