SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Ori) 101

B.N.MISRA
RAMESHLAL SANTUKA – Appellant
Versus
SURESHLAL SANTUKA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.MOHANTY, B.M.PATNAIK, B.MISHRA, B.P.DAS, J.P.PATNAIK, K.N.JENA, S.C.LAL

B. N. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THESE two revisions arise oat of Title Suit No. 383 of 1982 pending on the file of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuttack. The petitioner and the opposite party are the defendant and plaintiff respectively in the said suit. Civil Revision No. 487 of 1983 is directed against the order dated 15-7-1983 passed by the learned Additional Subordinate Judge rejecting the petitioner's application under Order. 6, Rule 17 of the Civil P. C. for amendment of the written statement. Civil Revision No. 486 of 1983 is directed against the order dated 16-7-1983 passed by the learned Additional Subordinate Judge rejecting the petitioner's application under Section 151 of the Civil P. C. praying for review of the aforesaid order dated 15-7-1983. These two revisions have been heard analogously.

( 2 ) DEFENDANT-PETITIONER Rameshlal, Maheshlal, Dinesh Lal and the Plaintiff-opposite party Sureshlal are the four sons of the late Kedarnath Santuka. The plaintiff's suit is for partition of the suit lands together with buildings, structures and the fittings described in the schedule appended to the plaint. According to the plaintiff, the suit properties were acquired in 196










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top