SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Ori) 104

D.PATHAK, P.K.MOHANTY, J.K.MOHANTY
RADHAMANI DIBYA – Appellant
Versus
BRAJA MOHAN BISWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K.SAHU, P.KAR, R.K.MOHAPATRA

P. K. MOHANTI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against a decree declaring the plaintiffs' occupancy right to the suit lands and confirming their possession over came. The question of law that arises for consideration is whether a bhagchasi is a tenant under the Orissa Tenancy Act, 1913: In the first instance, the appeal came up before a Division Bench to which one of us (P. K. Mohanti, J.) was a party. The Division Bench felt it desirable to place the appeal before a larger Bench in view of the conflict between the judgments of two different Division Benches of this Court regarding the status of a bhagchasi. That is how the entire appeal has been placed before us for disposal.

( 2 ) THE suit lands measuring 5. 70 acres as described in Schedule B of the plaint appertained to Anabadi Khata No. 192 under Tauzi No. 2390 in mauza San Bhubanpur. Defendant No. 1 Maheswar Dobai, Krushna Chandra Dobai, the father of defendants 2 and 3 and Mayadhar Dobai, the father of defendants 4 to 6 were the co-sharer landlords of the tauzi having one-third share therein. They granted leases of the suit lands from time to time for cultivation purposes to late Pravakar Biswal, the father of the plainti
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top