SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Ori) 95

R.C.PATNAIK
BANAMALI TRIPATHY – Appellant
Versus
BISWANATH PATTANAIK (DECEASED BY L. R. ) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.MISHRA, B.P.DAS, B.P.RAY, J.P.PATNAIK, K.K.GHOSH, P.MOHANTY, R.K.MOHAPATRA

R. C. PATNAIK, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiff's second appeal from an action for recovery of possession. The decree granted to him by the trial court has been reversed by the lower appellate court.

( 2 ) ONE Gobinda Panda had three sons, namely. Bhima. Madhaba alias Pada and Shyamsundar. After Gobinda's death, the three brothers separated and partitioned their property. Madhaba and Shyam sold their shares to Bhima who thus became the absolute owner of 1. 80 acres. For legal necessity, Bhima sold the entire 1. 80 acres to the plaintiff by registered sale deed dated 4-8-1905 and delivered possession of the property sold. The plaintiff sold 1. 15 acres to Balabhadra Kar and Krupasindhu Dash and retained Ac. 0. 65 with him which is the subject matter of the suit. It may be stated here that Bhima us the Karta of the joint family consisting of his brother, himself and members of the family had earlier executed a simple mortgage in favour of Biswanath, defendant No. 1. On 25-11-1968, defendant No. 1 filed mortgage Suit No. 440 of 1968 for foreclosure and sale. The plaintiff, who was a transferee from the mortgagor under the registered sale deed dated 4-8-1965, was not impleaded as a party







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top