SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Ori) 179

P.C.MISRA, G.B.PATTANAIK
UMA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
NARAYAN NAYAK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.Patnaik, P.V.Ramdas, R.K.MOHAPATRA

G. B. PATNAIK, J.

( 1 ) PLAINTIFFS appeal against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge, Aska, in a suit for declaration of the right of occupancy over the suit land measuring 35. 10 acres and for permanent injunction against the defendants restraining them from entering upon or otherwise interfering with the suit lands or in the alternative for recovery of possession of the suit lands.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFFS case, in short, in that one Harihar Misra purchased one-fourth interest in the property belonging to Nayak family of village Tilasingi for a consideration of Rs. 1,500/- in the year 1949. The said Harihar again purchased half share of the self-same joint property in the year 1955 through registered sale deeds (Exts. 2, 3, 4 and 5) from co-sharers for a consideration of Rs. 32,000/ -. It is alleged in the plaint that the consideration for the above transactions had been paid from time to time in between 1984 and 1955. The said Harihar instituted Title Suit No. 144 of 1957 in the Court of the Munsif, Aska, for partition and separate possession of his three-fourth share. During the pendency of the said suit, he executed a registered agreement (Ext. 19) dt. 26-10-1959 in fa










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top