SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ori) 39

P.C.MISRA, G.B.PATTANAIK
KHARAVELA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ORISSA STATE FINANCIAL CORPN. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.MOHANTY, BIPIN BEHARI MOHANTY, P.K.MISHRA, R.N.SINHA, S.N.SINHA

G. B. PATNAIK, J.

( 1 ) IN these two writ petitions, the action of the financial institution, namely, the Orissa State Financial Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "corporation") is being impugned by the entrepreneur essentially on the ground that the action of opposite party No. 1, the Corporation, is arbitrary and is calculated to confer undue favour on the Orissa Ceramic Industries Limited (opp. party No. 3 in O. J. C. 340 of 1984 and opp. party No. 2 in O. J. C. 427 of 1984 ). The petitioner also alleges that no due notice of the impugned action being given to the petitioner, there has been a flagrant violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently, the action of the Corporation is vitiated.

( 2 ) AFTER the country became independent, the Industrial Finance Corporation Act came to be enacted in 1948 to set up a Corporation called 'industrial Finance Corporation' with the object that the said Corporation would provide long-term credits to industrial undertakings. With the rapid growth of industries in different States, and to facilitate the object of industrialising the States, it was felt that financial institutions should also be set up in different














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top