SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ori) 69

B.K.BEHERA, D.P.MOHAPATRA
NIMAI MUNNU – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
I.C.DAS, N.C.PANIGRAHI

B. K. BEHERA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been directed against the judgment and order passed by Mr. P. Jena, Sessions Judge, finding the appellant to be guilty of the charge-of murder, convicting him under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him thereunder to undergo imprisonment for life. The appellant stood charged for committing the murder of his wife Gurubari (hereinafter to be referred to as Tthe deceased ). The prosecution had examined six witnesses to establish its case.

( 2 ) THE tale presented by the prosecution at the trial was one of a husband killing his wife suspecting her fidelity and for her secret love affairs with his younger brother of which there was no material other than the extra-judicial confession in the evidence of P. Ws. 3 and 4 which not only bristled with material discrepancies with regard to the exact words said to have been uttered by the appellant, but was also fraught with suspicious features to be discussed hereinafter. The prosecution had not been able to establish as to why the appellant would kill his wife, who, according to Vatsayana is half the man, the best friend, the root of the family and its perpetuity, the source of well-b





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top