SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ori) 149

G.B.PATTANAIK
BIMALA DEI – Appellant
Versus
KAMA MULIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.MOHANTY, S.K.Mund

G. B. PATTANAIK, J.


( 1 ) PETITIONER is the legally married wife of the opposite party who had obtained an order of monthly maintenance of Rs. 60/- in an application filed under S. 125 of the Criminal P. C. (hereinafter referred to as the "code" ). The application for maintenance was filed on 24-6-1977 and the Magistrate allowed the said application by order dt. 24-4-1978. Against the same order, the husband carried a revision to the Sessions Judge and the learned Sessions Judge dismissed the same by order dt. 13-9-1979. Thereafter, on 14-11-1979, an application was filed by the wife invoking the Magistrate's jurisdiction under sub-sec. (3) of S. 125 of the Code. The learned Magistrate by the impugned order has limited the claim of the wife to a period of one year from the date of filing of the application, i. e. up to 14-11-1978 on the ground that under the first proviso to sub-sec. (3) of 125 of the Code, no warrant can be issued for recovery of any amount due under the section unless the application be made to the Court to levy such amount within a period of one year from the date on which it became due.

( 2 ) MR. Mund, the learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top