S.C.MOHAPATRA
MISRA AND COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD. – Respondent
S. C. MOHAPATRA, J.
( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision arises out of an order of the learned Subordinate Judge, Jeypore refusing the prayer of the petitioner to restrain the opposite parties Nos. 1 and 2 from executing the balance portion of the work left unexecuted by the petitioner.
( 2 ) PETITIONER is a works contractor. He entered into an agreement with opposite party No. 1 to make some constructions. While the petitioner was executing the work, opposite party No. 1 issued notice to him that the agreement with him had come to an end with effect from 1-12-1984. The dispute arising out of the said action of the opposite party No. 1 was referred to the Deputy General Manager (opposite party No. 3) by the General Manager (opposite party No. 2), as required under the arbitration clause in the agreement. Apprehending that there would not be a fair settlement of the dispute by the opposite party No. 3, petitioner filed an application for removal of the Arbitrator on the ground of the interestedness. The trial Court removed the Arbitrator and appointed Mr. N. K. Das, a retired Judge of this Court as Arbitrator. The opposite parties Nos. 1 and 2 have filed Civil Revisions challenging the said o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.