SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ori) 153

S.C.MOHAPATRA
MISRA AND COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Routray, R.K.MOHAPATRA, U.C.Panda, Y.S.N.MURTY

S. C. MOHAPATRA, J.


( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision arises out of an order of the learned Subordinate Judge, Jeypore refusing the prayer of the petitioner to restrain the opposite parties Nos. 1 and 2 from executing the balance portion of the work left unexecuted by the petitioner.

( 2 ) PETITIONER is a works contractor. He entered into an agreement with opposite party No. 1 to make some constructions. While the petitioner was executing the work, opposite party No. 1 issued notice to him that the agreement with him had come to an end with effect from 1-12-1984. The dispute arising out of the said action of the opposite party No. 1 was referred to the Deputy General Manager (opposite party No. 3) by the General Manager (opposite party No. 2), as required under the arbitration clause in the agreement. Apprehending that there would not be a fair settlement of the dispute by the opposite party No. 3, petitioner filed an application for removal of the Arbitrator on the ground of the interestedness. The trial Court removed the Arbitrator and appointed Mr. N. K. Das, a retired Judge of this Court as Arbitrator. The opposite parties Nos. 1 and 2 have filed Civil Revisions challenging the said o






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top