SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ori) 131

B.N.MISRA
SUKADEV – Appellant
Versus
SIDHESWAR MAHADEV BIJA SILOD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.Mishra, S.P.Misra

B. N. MISRA, J.


( 1 ) RESPONDENTS 2 to 25 had filed a petition under S. 41 of the Orissa Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1951 (hereafter referred to as the 'act') for declaration that respondent No. 1, Sri Sidheswar Mahadev, was a public institution and that they and the late Abhi Tapaswi (Opp. party No. 1) and appellant No. 4 were the hereditary trustee of the deity. Their case is that their ancestors had installed the deity and they had all along done the Sebapuja and acted as Marfatdars of the deity. They had impleaded appellants 5 and 6 (opposite parties 3 and 4) as representing the Hindu public. The application of the respondents was registered by the learned Asst. Commissioner of Endowments on 10-12-76. The respondents had also filed an application for publication of a notice under the provisions of O. I, R. 8, C. P. C. A draft notice filed by the petitioner was approved and that petition was allowed on the same day. The notice under O. 1, R. 8 C. P. C. was published in the 'samaj' on 6-2-77 and the said publication is on record. In the meanwhile opp. parties 3 and 4 were set ex parte on 21-1-77 and on that day three persons, Nakula Senapati, Adikanda Behera and Dinabandhu Pa



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top