SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ori) 76

G.B.PATTANAIK
PITEI BEWA – Appellant
Versus
LAXMIDHAR JENA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.C.Sahoo, U.S.PATNAIK

G. B. PATTANAIK, J.


( 1 ) PETITIONER is the third wife of late Nari Jena and opposite parties 1 and 2 are the sons of Nari Jena through his second wife. After the death of Nari Jena as opposite parties neglected the petitioner and her two minor daughters, they filed an application under S. 125 of the Cr. P. C. claiming maintenance at the rate of Rs. 70/- per month. It was asserted in their petition that petitioner's husband Nari Jena had left some landed property which had been cultivated by the opposite parties and further opposite party No. 1 was an assistant in the office of the Inspector of Schools. The opposite parties in their objection asserted that the petitioner was not the wife of Nari Jena and further she was not unable to maintain, herself. It was also averred by them that some of the lands of Nari Jena had been given to the petitioner for her maintenance and, therefore, she was not entitled to any maintenance from them. The learned Magistrate came to hold that the petitioner was the wife of Nari Jena and step-mother of the opposite parties. He further found that the petitioner was unable to maintain herself as she was not in possession of any landed property left by Na





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top