SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ori) 204

G.B.PATTANAIK
PRAMOD KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
GOLEKHA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K.Mishra, S.K.PADHI

G. B. PATTANAIK, J.


( 1 ) THE petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court praying to expunge certain remarks made by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Aska in his judgment in G. R. Case No. 22/79 and to set aside the order of the learned Magistrate directing the petitioner to pay compensation to each of the accused persons in the said case on a finding that there was no sufficient ground for causing arrest of the accused persons.

( 2 ) THE petitioner was the informant in G. R. Case No. 22/79 and on the basis of his information a criminal case was instituted against opposite parties 1 to 4 on the allegation that the opposite parties forcibly entered into the homestead of the petitioner armed with deadly weapons and assaulted the field servants. Though charge-sheet was submitted against the opposite parties under Ss. 147/148/149/447/448/323/379/506, I. P. C. the opposite parties stood the trial for the offence under S. 448, I. P. C. The learned Judicial Magistrate, First class, Aska by order dt. 20-12-1983 acquitted the opposite parties and while acquitting, directed that the petitioner should pay compensation to the accused persons and in the judgment



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top