SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ori) 175

K.P.MOHAPATRA
SUJAN CHARAN – Appellant
Versus
PRAMILA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.DAS, B.H.MOHANTY, J.K.BASTIA, M.Patra, R.K.Nayak, S.P.MOHANTY, S.R.Patnaik

K. P. MOHAPATRA, J.


( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Cuttack confirming the order passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Jagatsinghpur under O. 39, Rr. 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure ('code' for short) restraining the petitioners from entering upon the suit land.

( 2 ) IN the suit, opposite party No. 1 is the plaintiff and opposite party No. 2 and the petitioners are defendants. Indisputedly, opposite party No. 2 (defendant) was the previous owner of the suit land consisting of a thatch house and fruit bearing trees. He is a close relation of the husband of opposite party No. 1. According to the case set up by opposite party No. 1, opposite party No. 2 having settled down in a different village agreed to sell the suit land in favour of opposite party No. 1 for a consideration of Rs. 17,000/- and executed a deed of contract for sale in her favour on 21-3-1984. In part performance of the contract opposite party No. 1 paid a sum of Rs. 7000/- to opposite party No. 2 and the latter delivered possession of the suit land to the former. Although opposite party No. 1 was at all times ready and willing to perform h









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top