K.P.MOHAPATRA
SUJAN CHARAN – Appellant
Versus
PRAMILA – Respondent
K. P. MOHAPATRA, J.
( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Cuttack confirming the order passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Jagatsinghpur under O. 39, Rr. 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure ('code' for short) restraining the petitioners from entering upon the suit land.
( 2 ) IN the suit, opposite party No. 1 is the plaintiff and opposite party No. 2 and the petitioners are defendants. Indisputedly, opposite party No. 2 (defendant) was the previous owner of the suit land consisting of a thatch house and fruit bearing trees. He is a close relation of the husband of opposite party No. 1. According to the case set up by opposite party No. 1, opposite party No. 2 having settled down in a different village agreed to sell the suit land in favour of opposite party No. 1 for a consideration of Rs. 17,000/- and executed a deed of contract for sale in her favour on 21-3-1984. In part performance of the contract opposite party No. 1 paid a sum of Rs. 7000/- to opposite party No. 2 and the latter delivered possession of the suit land to the former. Although opposite party No. 1 was at all times ready and willing to perform h
REFERRED TO : Doshei Dei v. Rama Routa
Govinda Chandra Tripathy v. Pal Hira Purchase Ltd.
Jeypore Evengelical Lutheran Church v. Samual Santhi Kumar Choudhury
Ram Baran Prasad v. Ram Mohit Hazza
Ravad Raibari v. Patarala Gouri Mahalaxmi Raimani
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.