SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Ori) 196

G.B.PATTANAIK
BRUNDABAN SAHU – Appellant
Versus
B. RAJENDRA SUBUDHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Baral, G.V.Vyas, J.DAS GUPTA, M.Patra, M.S.Hoque, R.R.Mohanty, Yasobant Das

G. B. PATTANAIK, J.


( 1 ) THE petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court to quash the cognisance taken by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Phulbani in I. C. C. No. 48 of 84 against the petitioner for the offence under S. 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and under Ss. 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. The opposite party filed a complaint alleging that the petitioner is trading in 'khara Masala' using similar wrapper as that of the complainant and thereby has committed the offence for which cognisance has been taken. On receipt of the said complaint and on examining the complainant, the learned Magistrate came to the conclusion that a prima facie case under S. 63 of the Copyright Act and under Ss. 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act has been established and, therefore, took cognisance summoning the accused to appear before him by 17th July, 1984.

( 2 ) MR. Das, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the averments made in the complaint petition as well as the initial statement of the complainant taken in entirety do not make out the offence for which the cognisance has been taken and, therefore, this Court should



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top