G.B.PATTANAIK
BRUNDABAN SAHU – Appellant
Versus
B. RAJENDRA SUBUDHI – Respondent
G. B. PATTANAIK, J.
( 1 ) THE petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court to quash the cognisance taken by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Phulbani in I. C. C. No. 48 of 84 against the petitioner for the offence under S. 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and under Ss. 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. The opposite party filed a complaint alleging that the petitioner is trading in 'khara Masala' using similar wrapper as that of the complainant and thereby has committed the offence for which cognisance has been taken. On receipt of the said complaint and on examining the complainant, the learned Magistrate came to the conclusion that a prima facie case under S. 63 of the Copyright Act and under Ss. 78 and 79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act has been established and, therefore, took cognisance summoning the accused to appear before him by 17th July, 1984.
( 2 ) MR. Das, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the averments made in the complaint petition as well as the initial statement of the complainant taken in entirety do not make out the offence for which the cognisance has been taken and, therefore, this Court should
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.