SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ori) 59

G.B.PATTANAIK
SUDARSAN BEURA – Appellant
Versus
PRASAN KUMAR DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.C.RATH, N.NAYAK, P.K.MOHANTY, S.Mishra

G. B. PATTANAIK, J.


( 1 ) DEFENDANT in a suit for declaration of right, title and interest and possession in respect of a piece of land measuring Ac. 0. 14 decimals is the petitioner.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiff he had purchased the land from the ex-Ruler of Badamba on 1-6-1972 and has been possessing the same ever since the date of purchase. As the defendant tried to disturb his possession, the suit was filed The defendant in his written statement alleges that the land in question is in the possession of the defendant which he has purchased from the very same vendor, namely, the ex-Ruler of Badamba and is in possession of the same with effect from the date of purchase which is 15-5-1972. It has been further alleged that the defendant has constructed his residential house on the said piece of land and further according to the written statement, the sketch-map attached to the plaint is incorrect.

( 3 ) IN course of trial, the defendant filed an application for amendment of his written statement. The proposed written statement is for addition of another fact, namely, that the land in question was intermediary interest and stood vested in the State of Orissa by Notification No.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top