SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ori) 188

K.P.MOHAPATRA
SURATH BEHERA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.MOHANTY, R.K.Patra

K. P. MOHAPATRA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a petition for bail under S. 439 (1) of the Criminal P. C. by one of the accused in S. T. No. 168 of 1986 under Ss. 147, 148, 337, 323, 379 and 302 read with S. 149 I. P. C. in the court of the learned Sessions Judge, Puri.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case against the petitioner in brief is that on 11-10-1985 at about 10 a. m, all the accused persons being armed with deadly weapons such as Lathis and Tentas surrounded deceased Nakula when the petitioner, who was armed with a Tenta (Tenta is a spear with more than one sharp blade meant for stabbing) assaulted the deceased by means of it, as a result, one of the blades pierced into the left side of the chest which resulted in his death.

( 3 ) THE accused persons (eleven in number) moved for bail before the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khurda, who refused to release them on bail. The accused persons moved for bail before the learned Sessions Judge, Puri, who by separate orders released all the accused persons except the petitioner on bail. Later, the petitioner again moved the learned Sessions Judge for bail on the ground that in the absence of valid orders of remand his detention was illeg










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top