SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ori) 5

S.C.MOHAPATRA
RUSHI – Appellant
Versus
MADAN BEHERA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.B.RATHOD, M.MISHRA, P.K.BHUYAN, R.K.MOHAPATRA

S. C. MOHAPATRA, J.


( 1 ) THIS appeal under O. 43, R. 1 (u), C. P. C. , arises out of an order of remand of the suit by the appellate court to the trial court.

( 2 ) THE suit relates to a piece of land locally named 'burakuti Bandha'. The defendant having claimed the land to be his, the suit has been filed by the villagers purporting to be one under O. 1, R. 8, C. P. C. , for permanently restraining the defendant from interfering with the suit land. The case of the defendant is that he has acquired title by adverse possession over the suit land of which he is in possession and enjoyment.

( 3 ) NINE issues were framed of which issues 7 and 8 are :"7. Has the defendant perfected his title over the suit land by way of adverse possession? 8. Is the suit land communal in nature?"

( 4 ) THE trial court held in answering issue 7 that the defendant is in possession of the suit land for more than thirty years. In answer to issue 8 the trial court held that the suit land is used for communal purpose of using the water of the tank for bathing, drinking and cultivation. On these findings the trial court having permanently restrained the defendant from interfering with the suit land in any ma






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top