HARI LAL AGRAWAL
UMESH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
HARILAL AGARWAL, J.
( 1 ) THIS application in revision under S. 115 of the Civil P. C. , which is by the judgement-debtor whose objection to the executability of the decree in question has been overruled by the executing court, raises an interesting question as to whether a decree passed on the basis of a plaint signed, verified and filed by the Branch Manager of a bank, was a nullity and thus inexecutable.
( 2 ) THE decree-holder Bank (opposite party No. 1) instituted a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 24,524. 27 from the petitioner and another, being the outstanding balance in a loan account against them. The said suit was decreed on contest and after passing a preliminary decree for the said amount, the final decree for sale of the hypothecated goods was also passed by the trial court and ultimately the decree was put into execution.
( 3 ) THE judgement-debtor filed a petition under S. 47 of the Code challenging the validity of the said decree, inter alia, on the ground that the plaintiff Bank being represented by the Branch Manager of Puri and the plaint having been signed by him, the suit was not properly instituted and, therefore, the decree was a nullity. It further appea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.