SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ori) 86

HARI LAL AGRAWAL
UMESH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.B.MISHRA, B.K.NANDA, S.N.SINHA

HARILAL AGARWAL, J.


( 1 ) THIS application in revision under S. 115 of the Civil P. C. , which is by the judgement-debtor whose objection to the executability of the decree in question has been overruled by the executing court, raises an interesting question as to whether a decree passed on the basis of a plaint signed, verified and filed by the Branch Manager of a bank, was a nullity and thus inexecutable.

( 2 ) THE decree-holder Bank (opposite party No. 1) instituted a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 24,524. 27 from the petitioner and another, being the outstanding balance in a loan account against them. The said suit was decreed on contest and after passing a preliminary decree for the said amount, the final decree for sale of the hypothecated goods was also passed by the trial court and ultimately the decree was put into execution.

( 3 ) THE judgement-debtor filed a petition under S. 47 of the Code challenging the validity of the said decree, inter alia, on the ground that the plaintiff Bank being represented by the Branch Manager of Puri and the plaint having been signed by him, the suit was not properly instituted and, therefore, the decree was a nullity. It further appea


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top