SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ori) 166

HARI LAL AGRAWAL, B.K.BEHERA
HRUSHIKESH PANDA – Appellant
Versus
INDRAMANI SWAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R.MISHRA, P.K.MISHRA, R.N.SINHA, S.N.SINHA.

H. L. AGRAWAL, C. J.

( 1 ) IN this appeal against the judgement of a learned single Judge arising out of an execution proceeding, the question for consideration is as to whether the executing court can construe the decree.

( 2 ) A joint and several decree was passed in favour of respondent 1 by the trial court for Rs. 50,401. 77 against the appellant and respondent 2, a limited company of which the appellant was the Managing Director, in Oct. , 1974.

( 3 ) WHEN the decree was put to execution and the decree-holder proceeded against the personal properties of the appellant-Managing Director, he filed an objection u/s. 47 of the Civil P. C. challenging his liability in his personal capacity. The executing court upheld the objection, but on appeal by the decree-holder, a learned single Judge of this Court, rejected the objection of the appellant.

( 4 ) THE relevant facts may now be briefly stated. The appellant as the Managing Director of the Judgement-debtor-company (defendant 1) placed orders with the decree-holder for supply of some building materials. Payments were made from time to time, but ultimately a sum of Rs. 1,56,000/- is said to remain due to the plaintiff from the de











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top