SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ori) 143

S.C.MOHAPATRA
TATANAGAR TRANSPORT CORPN – Appellant
Versus
AJANTA ENTERPRISERS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANANG PATNAIK, L.PANGARI, N.C.PATNAIK

S. C. MOHAPATRA, J.


( 1 ) DEFENDANTS are the appellants in this appeal under O. 43, R. 1 (u), Civil P. C. against an order under O. 38, R. 5, C. P. C. , directing them to furnish security.

( 2 ) MONEY Suit No. 324 of 1986 was filed in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, First Court, Cuttack, for recovery of Rs. 2,84,852. 89 paise alleged to have been taken by the appellants as loan from the plaintiff respondent 1. In the said suit plaintiff filed an application for attachment of some aluminium ingots which were alleged to have been intended to be taken out of the jurisdiction of the Court for the purpose of defrauding the plaintiff. Alternatively it was prayed that the security should be directed to be furnished by the defendants. The trial Court attached the aluminium ingots by an ex parte order. After appearance, the appellants raised objection on the ground that they were only carriers. The attachment was vacated by the trial Court which was challenged in this Court in Misc. Appeal No. 210 of 1986. While confirming the order this Court directed the trial Court to consider the question of furnishing security as prayed for by the plaintiff. In this background the present order ha











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top