SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Ori) 132

G.B.PATTANAIK, LINGARAJA RATH
AGADHU DAS – Appellant
Versus
BABAN PARIDA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Nanda, D.P.SAHU

L. RATH, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision has been referred to the Division Bench by order of Hon'ble Mr. J. K. Mohanty, J. (as he then was) on the question whether in a warrant case instituted upon a complaint, the accused persons can be discharged under 245 (2), Criminal P. C. if after repeated opportunity the complainant fails to produce any material evidence.

( 2 ) THE petitioner filed a complaint before the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhubaneswar against the opposite parties on which 1. 00 No. 1 of 1977 was registered. The learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhubaneswar took cognizance in the case on 19-1-1977 under Ss. 379 and 323, Penal Code and after examining the petitioner directed summons to be issued to the opposite parties for appearance. Thereafter several, dates of hearing were fixed with direction to the petitioner to bring his witnesses but however since after various adjournments the petitioner did not produce any witness, the learned Magistrate recorded an order on 29-11-1979 as follows : -"even after repeated opportunities complainant had failed to produce any material evidence to frame charge. The accused persons are discharged under S. 245 (1), Crimina







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top