SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ori) 109

R.C.PATNAIK
PITABASH – Appellant
Versus
ORISSA STATE FINANCIAL CORPN. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.CH.SAHU, R.N.SINHA, S.N.SINHA, SAMARESHWAR MOHANTY

R. C. PATNAIK, J.


( 1 ) THE question that has arisen in these two matters - a Civil Revision and a Miscellaneous Appeal have been filed by way of abundant caution - is, if the provisions contained in O. 21, R. 58 of the C. P. C. are applicable to proceeding under S. 31 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 (Central Act No. LXIII of 1951) (Hereinafter called 'the Act') read with S. 32 thereof.

( 2 ) SHORN of unnecessary details, the facts in short are : one Parikhit Chhotary, brother of the petitioner, had obtained a loan from the Orissa State Financial Corporation (hereinafter called, 'the Corporation') mortgaging certain property as security for the loan. On his default in payment of loan, steps were taken for sale of the property mortgaged. In course of the proceeding, the property was directed to be sold. At this stage, the petitioner, brother of Parikhit, filed an application under O. 21, R. 58 of the C. P. C. for the lifting of the order of attachment and release of his property from the proposed sale. The learned District Judge rejected the application as incompetent holding that the provisions contained in O. 21, R. 58 were not applicable to proceeding under S. 32 of















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top