SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ori) 118

R.C.PATNAIK, D.P.MOHAPATRA
SUKADEV SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.MISHRA, D.K.SAHU, G.Routray, M.R.MOHANTY, P.K.MISHRA, P.KAR, S.K.SWAIN

R. C. PATNAIK, J.

( 1 ) IN these writ applications under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners assail the action of the State Government and its officials refusing to grant T. T. Permit for export of fire-wood and Charcoal from the State to places outside it.

( 2 ) THE petitioners carry on business in Charcoal and fire-wood. They purchase the same either from State agencies or private parties and sell the same either inside the State or transport the same for sale outside. Their applications for grant of Timber Transit Permit for transport of Charcoal or fire-wood, as the case may be, outside the State were either rejected vide Annexure-3 dt. 31-8-86 in O. J. C. No. 2515/85 or not processed as in the other two writ applications on the ground that a ban had been imposed on the export of Charcoal and fire-wood to places outside. Such actions of the State Government and its officials despite the decision of this Court in O. J. C. No. I078/81 (S. K. Shariff v. State of Orissa) decided on 27-7-1981, according to the petitioners, were liable to be deprecated. The right of the petitioners to carry on business was a fundamental right guaranteed under Art. 19 (1) (g) of t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top