R.C.PATNAIK, D.P.MOHAPATRA
SUKADEV SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
R. C. PATNAIK, J.
( 1 ) IN these writ applications under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners assail the action of the State Government and its officials refusing to grant T. T. Permit for export of fire-wood and Charcoal from the State to places outside it.
( 2 ) THE petitioners carry on business in Charcoal and fire-wood. They purchase the same either from State agencies or private parties and sell the same either inside the State or transport the same for sale outside. Their applications for grant of Timber Transit Permit for transport of Charcoal or fire-wood, as the case may be, outside the State were either rejected vide Annexure-3 dt. 31-8-86 in O. J. C. No. 2515/85 or not processed as in the other two writ applications on the ground that a ban had been imposed on the export of Charcoal and fire-wood to places outside. Such actions of the State Government and its officials despite the decision of this Court in O. J. C. No. I078/81 (S. K. Shariff v. State of Orissa) decided on 27-7-1981, according to the petitioners, were liable to be deprecated. The right of the petitioners to carry on business was a fundamental right guaranteed under Art. 19 (1) (g) of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.