SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ori) 129

G.B.PATTANAIK
PURNA CHANDRA BISWAL – Appellant
Versus
BRINDABAN BISWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.NAYAK, B.P.RAY, B.R.SARANGI

G. B. PATNAIK, J.

( 1 ) FIRST party member in a proceeding under section 145 of the Code ofcriminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) is the petitioner against the revisional order of the Sessions Judge. The learned Sessions Judge by the impugned order has set aside the order of the Magistrate and dropped the proceedings under section 145 of the Code mainly on the ground that the parties being joint and there being no partition amongst them the proceeding under section 145 of the Code is inappropriate.

( 2 ) ADMITTEDLY, the petitioner and opposite parties are brothers. It is the case of the petitioner first party that there was a partition amongst the brothers during the life-time of their father and the disputed Bhogara lands fell to the petitioners share whereas the raiyati lands belonging to the father fell to the share of the opposite parties. Since the opposite parties created disturbance in the possession of the petitioner after the death of their father, the petitioner approached the Magistrate for initiating a proceeding under section 145 of the Code. The case of the opposite parties-second party members, on the other hand, was that there was no partition am







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top