D.P.MOHAPATRA
PRAFULLA KUMAR SINGH DEO – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
D. P. MOHAPATRA, J.
( 1 ) THE short question that arises for consideration in this revision petition is whether the application filed by the petitioner under S. 8 (2) of the Arbitration Act ( for short 'the Act') for appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes is barred by limitation. The trial Court having answered the question in the affirmative, the petitioner has moved this Court in revision challenging the said order.
( 2 ) THE facts relevant for the present proceeding may be shortly stated thus : The petitioner was entrusted with the work of construction of "s/r to approach road of Budhabalanga Bridge on 54th Mile of S. N. K. U. B. Midnapur Border Road - MDR 5 for 1974-75. " The parties executed an agreement bearing No. 92/f2 of 1974-75 for the purpose. After completion of the work, the amount under the final bill was paid to the petitioner on 30th July, 1978. The amount mentioned therein having fallen short of his claims, the petitioner is said to have represented to the authorities for paying him the balance dues. Having failed in his attempt to get his dues settled amicably, the petitioner issued a notice on 29-7-81 to the Chief Engineer (R. and B.), Governmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.