SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ori) 17

G.B.PATTANAIK
T. SUSILA PATRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Padhi, J.R.BOHARA, S.K.PADHI

G. B. PATNAIK, J.

( 1 ) BOTH these revisions arise out of the one and the same case and, therefore, were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The two petitioners have been convicted under section 7 (1) (a) of the Essential Commodities Act for having contravened clause 15 of the Orissa Cement Control Order, 1973 (herein after referred to as the Control Order) and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months each and to pay a fine of rupees one thousand each, in default to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for one month.

( 2 ) PETITIONER T. Susila Patra who is petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 183 of 1983 is the wife of T. Shyam Babu Patra who is petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 190 of 1983. They stood their trial for having contravened the provisions of clauses 11/2), 15, 16 and 17 of the Control Order as well as Conditions 2 and 6 of the Licence issued under the said Order, but the prosecution having failed to establish regarding violation of clauses 11 (2), 16 and 17 they have been acquitted of the said charges by the learned Magistrate. Their conviction in question is, however, for the contravention of clause is of th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top