SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ori) 74

LINGARAJA RATH
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
B. D. JHUNJHUNWALA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Pal, R.B.Mohapatra

LINGARAJA RATH, J.


( 1 ) THE Union of India through the Chief Commercial Superintendent (Claims), S. E. Rly. who is the defendant in the court below is in appeal against the decree passed against it in a suit claiming compensation on account of loss of 21,760 liters of furnace oil.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff-respondent brought the suit on the pleadings that he had purchased the amount of furnace oil from the Indian Oil Corporation, Visakhapatnam wherefrom it was despatched to the Barang railway station. The consignment having never reached Barang, he sustained the loss for which he claimed the compensation. It was also pleaded that the plaintiff had issued notice to the Railways under S. 78-B read with S. 140 of the Railways Act as also under S. 80, Civil, P. C. which were received by the defendant on 10-10-1972, but however since there was no redressal of his grievance, he was compelled to file the suit.

( 3 ) THE suit was contested by the appellant denying all the plaint averments and contending that the suit was not maintainable since firstly, the Union of India had not been represented in accordance with law; secondly, no notice as contemplated under S. 80, C. P. C. , had been serve





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top