SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Ori) 8

K.P.MOHAPATRA
KHAGESWAR NAIK – Appellant
Versus
DOMUNI BEWA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.M.PATNAIK, K.N.JENA, S.Mishra

K. P. MOHAPATRA, J.


( 1 ) THE appellant who was the sole defendant in the court below has assailed the judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Bhawanipatna declaring title of respondent 1 (plaintiff 1) in the suit in respect of immovable property described in schs. A and B of the plaint, confirmation of her possession over Sch. B land, directing recovery of possession of Sch. A land and granting mesne profits @ Rs. 326/per year beginning from the year 1972.

( 2 ) THE respondents jointly instituted the suit. Their case, in brief, is that Keshab had three sons namely Trilochan, Khageswar and Nilamani. Khageswar is the defendant-appellant. Respondent 2 is the natural born son of Trilochan and respondent 1 was the legally married wife of Nilamani. The three brothers named above effected partition of joint family property inherited from their father Keshab. In the said partition 19. 06 acres of cultivable land described in the Sch. A and 0. 23 acres of homestead land consisting of a house described in Sch. B of the plaint excluding some other lands which had been transferred fell to the share of Nilamani. As he had no children of his own, Nilamani adopted responden














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top