K.P.MOHAPATRA
KHAGESWAR NAIK – Appellant
Versus
DOMUNI BEWA – Respondent
K. P. MOHAPATRA, J.
( 1 ) THE appellant who was the sole defendant in the court below has assailed the judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Bhawanipatna declaring title of respondent 1 (plaintiff 1) in the suit in respect of immovable property described in schs. A and B of the plaint, confirmation of her possession over Sch. B land, directing recovery of possession of Sch. A land and granting mesne profits @ Rs. 326/per year beginning from the year 1972.
( 2 ) THE respondents jointly instituted the suit. Their case, in brief, is that Keshab had three sons namely Trilochan, Khageswar and Nilamani. Khageswar is the defendant-appellant. Respondent 2 is the natural born son of Trilochan and respondent 1 was the legally married wife of Nilamani. The three brothers named above effected partition of joint family property inherited from their father Keshab. In the said partition 19. 06 acres of cultivable land described in the Sch. A and 0. 23 acres of homestead land consisting of a house described in Sch. B of the plaint excluding some other lands which had been transferred fell to the share of Nilamani. As he had no children of his own, Nilamani adopted responden
FOLLOWED ON : Sulochana Dei v. Khali Dei
Badri Prasad v. Dy.Director of Consolidation
Kasturi Devi v. Dy.Director of Consolidation
REFERRED TO : Annapurna Chakrabarty v. Kalpana Debi
FOLLOWED ON : Pandurang Narayan Salunke v. Sindhu
REFERRED TO : Chinnappavu Naidu v. Meenakshi Ammal
FOLLOWED ON : Punithavalli Ammal v. Ramalingam
REFERRED TO : Mst. Bhuri Bai v. Mst. Champi Bai
FOLLOWED ON : Gokal Chand v. Pravin Kumari
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.