SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Ori) 91

K.P.MOHAPATRA
BAIDYANATHA DAS – Appellant
Versus
GHANA DAS AND ORS. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.MISHRA, B.Panda, D.NAYAK, D.P.Dhal, R.R.ROY, SAKTIDHAR DAS

K. P. MOHAPATRA, J.

( 1 ) IN this revision the informant-petitioner has challenged the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Balasore acquitting the accused-opposite parties of offences under Sections 143 and, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case shorn of unnecessary details is stated below. The petitioner (P. W. 1) and his two brothers purchased the disputed homestead land measuring Ac. 0. 28 decimals appertaining to M. S. plot Nos. 820, 821 and 822 in Khata No. 301 of mouja Gobindpur by a registered sale deed (Ext. 2) dated 20 -12 - 1976 for consideration from one Pagali Dei. After purchase they enclosed the area which centained bamboo clumps. On 9-6-1980 at about 9 a. m. the opposite parties one of whom named Maguni Das has in the meantime died entered inside the disputed land and despite protests, cut and removed a large number of bamboos from the bamboo clumps. Several witnesses including me Grama Rakhi (p. w. 2) saw the incident. On the next day the petitioner (P. W. 1) gave a written report (Ext. 1) to the A. S. I. of Balimunds. Out - post (P. W. 6) who commenced investigation during which he saized 21 pieces of bamboos from the Ban of deceased Ma











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top