SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Ori) 84

J.DAS
STATE OF ORISSA – Appellant
Versus
KRUSHNA CHANDRA TRIPATHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Harmohan Jena, N.Rout, R.K.Nayak, S.Muduli

J. DAS, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a suo motu revision with a view to examine the legality, propriety and correctness of the order dt. 6-12-84 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jharsugda allowing withdrawal of G. R. case No. 974 of 1981 and as a consequence of that acquittal of the accused.

( 2 ) G. R. Case No. 974 of 1981 was registered on 7-12-81 on receipt of the F. I. R. of D. I. C. , Rengali Police Station and the charge-sheet was submitted on 20-12-82 under S. 394, I. P. C. and cognizance was taken on the same day. On 28-1-84 charge under S. 392, i. P. C. was framed against the accused and the accused pleaded not guilty to the charge and claimed for trial. Then the case proceeded for trial. On 16-3-84, it appears that 8 prosecution witnesses were present. As the accused was absent, prosecution witnesses were discharged and N. B. W. A. was issued against the accused and the bail bond was forfeited. On 8-5-84 the case was advanced and a petition for withdrawal of the case was filed. The petition for withdrawal appears to have been written by the Asstt. Public Prosecutor, Jharsuguda. On 20-10-84 the Public Prosecutor himself filed a petition for withdrawal of the case. On











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top