SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Ori) 81

S.C.MOHAPATRA
BINAYAK MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.NAYAK, H.S.Mishra, N.C.PATIL, P.K.MISHRA

S. C. MOHAPATRA, J.

( 1 ) - This is an application under section 482, Criminal Procedure Code.

( 2 ) PETITIONERS are accused facing their trial in the court of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Bolangir in Sessions Case No. 78/1-6 of 1985-86. On 29-9- 1986, an application was filed for adjournment of trial till commitment of LC. C. No. 66 of 1985 in the court of the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bolangir, claiming the same to be a counter case to the prosecution in the Sessions Case. Learned Assistant Sessions Judge called for the records of I. C. C. No. 66 of 1985 for determination whether the same is a counter case. On 25-10-1986, the learned Assistant Sessions Judge persued the record of the complaint case and held: It appears from the complaint filed by Binayak Misra (accused in this case), that Bhagaban Bagarty who is injured in the S. C. Case No. 78-1 of 85-86 and Bharat Bagarty, informant in the Sessions Case assaulted the accused persons on 30-5-85 at about the same time of the occurrence. On perusal of the records of both the cases, it is found that the I. C. C. Case is counter to the said S. C. No. 78-1 of 85-86. Hence, the petition for adjournment till commitment of







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top