S.ACHARYA, G.K.MISRA
Jagabandhu Senapati – Appellant
Versus
Bhagu Senapati – Respondent
Judgement
G.K. MISRA, C.J. :- The following genealogy as appended to the plaint would show the relationship amongst the plaintiff, defendants 1 to 3 and defendants 4 to 8.
Dinabhandhu and Minei were brothers. Puni Bewa (D-3) is the widow of Hari. Defendant 1, plaintiff and defendant 2 are the sons of defendant 3. Defendants 4 to 8 belong to the branch of Minei. Admittedly the Branches of Dinabandhu and Minei are separate in status.
Plaintiff filed the suit for partition claiming one-sixth share in Schedule B properties consisting of 15.29 acres asserting that they are the joint properties of the two branches of Dinabandhu and Minei. He claimed one-third share in Schedule C properties measuring 3.38 acres alleging that they are the self-acquired properties of the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 3 acquired out of joint family funds and joint effort and exertion of the members irrespective of their being recorded in the names of different members of the family. Schedule D properties are movables in which the plaintiff claims one-third share. Thus in the prayer for partition, plaintiff did not state that his mother, defendant 3, is entitled to a share also.
2. Defendants 1 to 3 filed a join
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.