R.L.NARASIMHAM
Raimon Ho – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ORDER : During the hearing of this revision petition the question arose about the legality and propriety of the order D/- 14-5-1962 passed by the Sub-divisional Magistrate of Karanjia in Complaint Case No. 84 of 1961. Mr. S.C. Mohapatra who appeared for the accused persons in that case accepted notice on behalf of those persons, calling upon them to show cause why the order dated 14-5-1962 may not be set aside and he was permitted to argue this point both on facts and on law.
2. The material facts connected with this revision petition are as follows : One Donga Rensa Ho (P.W. 1) filed a complaint before the learned Magistrate on 4-9-61 against the two accused persons (petitioners before me) alleging that they caused him injuries. The learned Sub-divisional Magistrate on the same day, after examining the complainant on solemn affirmation, took cognizance of the offence and summoned the accused persons under S. 323 I.P.C. This was registered as complaint case No. 84 of 1961. On 21-7-1961 the same complainant had lodged information at Parwan. P.S. against the two petitioners alleging that they had caused him injuries. Apparently, this F.I.R. was actually under investigation when the co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.