S.BARMAN, G.K.MISRA
Hemchandra Dansana – Appellant
Versus
Dolamani Dansana – Respondent
Judgement
MISRA, J. :- Defendant is the appellant against a confirming judgment. The relation of the parties would appear from the following genealogical tree.
Mahendra was the protected Thikadar of village Bhairapur in Barpalli Zamindari. After his death, Raghumani became the protected Thikadar and possessed all the SIR and KHUDKAST lands of the village. In a partition between Raghumani and the defendant the disputed property was allotted to their mother Kanchan towards her maintenance. The plaintiffs' case is that it was agreed that the disputed lands would revert to Raghumani after the death of Kanchan. She died in 1952 and thereafter the lands reverted to plaintiff No. 1 who was the Thikadar
after his father's death. The lands were subsequently partitioned amongst the plaintiffs who were possessing different portions in their individual right, title and interest. The defendant created disturbance in their possession and a proceeding under S. 145, Cr. P.C. was started. The preliminary order was passed on 13-11-1958 and the proceeding terminated in favour of the defendant on 3-8-1959. The suit was filed on 16-8-1959.
2. Defendant admits that the disputed lands were allotted to Kanc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.