SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Ori) 6

S.BARMAN, G.K.MISRA
Hemchandra Dansana – Appellant
Versus
Dolamani Dansana – Respondent


Advocates:
R. N. Misra, for Appellant; H. Sen, for Respondents.

Judgement

MISRA, J. :- Defendant is the appellant against a confirming judgment. The relation of the parties would appear from the following genealogical tree.

Mahendra was the protected Thikadar of village Bhairapur in Barpalli Zamindari. After his death, Raghumani became the protected Thikadar and possessed all the SIR and KHUDKAST lands of the village. In a partition between Raghumani and the defendant the disputed property was allotted to their mother Kanchan towards her maintenance. The plaintiffs' case is that it was agreed that the disputed lands would revert to Raghumani after the death of Kanchan. She died in 1952 and thereafter the lands reverted to plaintiff No. 1 who was the Thikadar

after his father's death. The lands were subsequently partitioned amongst the plaintiffs who were possessing different portions in their individual right, title and interest. The defendant created disturbance in their possession and a proceeding under S. 145, Cr. P.C. was started. The preliminary order was passed on 13-11-1958 and the proceeding terminated in favour of the defendant on 3-8-1959. The suit was filed on 16-8-1959.

2. Defendant admits that the disputed lands were allotted to Kanc







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top