SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Ori) 149

R.N.MISRA
Chaitan Das – Appellant
Versus
Murali Dalai – Respondent


Advocates:
D. Mohanty and P. K. Pal, for Appellants; J. Rath, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT :- The defendants are in appeal against a confirming judgment of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuttack in a suit for declaration of tenancy right, recovery of possession and mesne profits both past and future.

2. The plaintiffs came to court with the case that the suit lands which are locally known as Maneipat, a water-logged area are in an Anabadi Khata of the ex-State of Sukinda. It is said that the plaintiffs dug a channel some time in 1938 and after the water was drained out some lands became fit for cultivation and they have been in possession of the said lands. The Sukinda estate was under the management of Court of Wards by then and they applied to the Court for lease and the manager of the Wards Estate recommended it to the Collector of Cuttack. The Additional District Magistrate considered the recommendation of the manager and directed the plaintiffs to deposit the salami. The plaintiffs deposited the salami on 8-8-51 and received delivery of possession of the property. But before a formal patta could be issued, the management of the estate by the Court of Wards terminated and soon thereafter the ex-estate of Sukinda came to vest in the State of Orissa


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top