SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Ori) 95

R.N.MISRA
Priyanath Mohanty – Appellant
Versus
Indumati Bewa – Respondent


Advocates:
R. C. Mohanty, for Appellant; G. C. Sengupta, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT :- The defendant is in appeal against a reversing judgment of the learned First Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuttack, in a suit for declaration that the defendant is not the adopted son of the plaintiff's husband and has thus no right, title or interest in the disputed property described in the Kha Schedule.

2. Jagannath, Balabhadra and Padma Charan were three brothers and belonged to a joint family. The plaintiff happens to be the widow of Padma Charan. On the death of Padma Charan, Jagannath was looking after the family properties as Karta. The defendant is the sister's son of the plaintiff's husband Padma Charan. He had never been taken in adoption by Padma Charan or the plaintiff. After Padma Charan's death there were some disputes and the defendant came to the plaintiff and persuaded her to execute a power-of-attorney so that the defendant would support the plaintiff and the plaintiff would not be harassed by her husband's brothers. The plaintiff is a pardanashin illiterate lady and having implicit faith in the defendant put signatures to a document without knowing its contents. Later on the plaintiff came to learn that it was a document acknowledging the adoption of







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top