SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Ori) 340

S.C.PARIJA
Shuvam Construction Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Babita Mohanty – Respondent


ORDER

S.C. Parija, J.

1. The order of the Ad hoc Addl. District Judge, Fast Track Court No. II, Bhubaneswar, dated 03,03.2008, passed in C.S. No. 120 of 2003, rejecting the petitioner's application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) read with Section 151 C.P.C., is under challenge in the present writ application.

2. The facts, giving rise to the present writ application is that the plaintiff-opposite party No. 1 filed C.S. No. 120 of 2003 in the court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhubaneswar, against the defendant-opposite party No. 2, for eviction, recovery of arrear rent and mesne profit. During the pendency of the civil suit, the plaintiff-opposite party No. 1 sold her right, title and interest in the suit property to the present petitioner by registered sale deeds dated 16.06.2004. After the sale of the suit property, as the plaintiff-opposite party No. 1 did not pursue the civil suit in the right earnest and as the present petitioner, being a Us pendens transferee had vital interest in the suit, the petitioner filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) read with Section 151 CPC for being impleaded as plaintiff in the civil suit. The said application was objected to by the defen













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top