SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ori) 117

A.S.NAIDU
Orissa State Financial Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Chandra Behera – Respondent


Advocates:
For Appellant :M/s. B. H. Mohanty, R. K. Nayak, D. P. Mohanty and D. K. Mohanty
For Respondents:None

JUDGMENT

A. S. NAIDU, J. — The Orissa State Financial Corporation being aggrieved by an order dated 12.12.1997 passed by District Judge, Cuttack in a proceeding initiated under Section 31 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) has preferred this Miscellaneous Appeal invoking jurisdic¬tion under Section 32 (9) of the Act.

2. The Orissa State Financial Corporation (hereinafter referred to ‘OSFC) filed an application under Section 31 of the Act for a direction to sell the properties attached by it for realisation of its outstanding dues towards loan and also to permit it to enforce the personal liability of the guarantor for realisation of the amount due along with agreed interest till realisation. The District Judge by the impugned order dismissed the Misc. Case against the loanee (opposite party-respondent No.1) observing that the loanee cannot be held personally liable for payment of the outstanding dues, but the hypothecated proper¬ty can be attached and allowed the OSFC to proceed against re¬spondent No. 2, the surety, to realise the loan amount along with agreed interest till realisation. The OSFC was also permitted to sell the prop















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top