P.C.NAIK, P.K.MOHANTY
State of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Chaitanya Gouda and five – Respondent
ORDER
1.5.2001. — Opp. parties 1,2 and 5 are working as Work-charged employees from the year 1969, 1964 and 1963 respectively, whereas opp. parties 3 and 4 retired as Work-charged employees after having worked from 1962 and 1965 respectively in the establish¬ment in question. No pensionary benefits having been extended, they approached the Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Bhubaneswar by way of Original Application No. 622 of 1999 for a direction to the Respondents to grant them retirement and other benefits by declaring them to be regular employees.
By following a decision in a batch of cases, the Tribunal allowed the Original Application in the following terms :
“I accordingly direct that the applicants shall be absorbed in any establishment posts from the time they completed five years continuous service till the date when they retired from service. After such absorption, their pension and other pension¬ary benefits shall be computed on the basis of the notional fixation of pay in the regular establishment by adding annual increments which fell due and also taking into account various revisions of pay scales that were introduced. The process shall be completed within three months
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.