SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ori) 171

P.C.NAIK, P.K.MOHANTY
State of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Chaitanya Gouda and five – Respondent


ORDER

1.5.2001. — Opp. parties 1,2 and 5 are working as Work-charged employees from the year 1969, 1964 and 1963 respectively, whereas opp. parties 3 and 4 retired as Work-charged employees after having worked from 1962 and 1965 respectively in the establish¬ment in question. No pensionary benefits having been extended, they approached the Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Bhubaneswar by way of Original Application No. 622 of 1999 for a direction to the Respondents to grant them retirement and other benefits by declaring them to be regular employees.

By following a decision in a batch of cases, the Tribunal allowed the Original Application in the following terms :

“I accordingly direct that the applicants shall be absorbed in any establishment posts from the time they completed five years continuous service till the date when they retired from service. After such absorption, their pension and other pension¬ary benefits shall be computed on the basis of the notional fixation of pay in the regular establishment by adding annual increments which fell due and also taking into account various revisions of pay scales that were introduced. The process shall be completed within three months





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top