SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ori) 236

A.S.NAIDU
Malatilata Samal – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
For Petitioners:Mr. M. S. Panda
For Opp. parties:Mr. P. K. Mohanty, Addl. Govt. Advocate

JUDGMENT

A. S. NAIDU, J. — The confirming order passed in a proceeding initiated under Section 56 of the Orissa Forest Act, 1982 (as amended by Orissa Act 9/83) (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) directing confiscation of the offending truck which was used in an offence of carrying unauthorised timber is challenged in this Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

2. The short facts as revealed from the prosecution case are that on September 25, 1992, the Forester of Balugaon Range while patrolling on National Highway No. V along with his staff intercepted a truck bearing registration number OR-O4-8197 near Balugaon. The truck was being driven by driver engaged by the owner Surendra Kumar Samal (who has died in the meanwhile and the petitioners are his legal heirs). The Helper of the truck and another person were also on board the truck. On search, the Forester found ninety two pieces of sawn Teak planks which were illegally transported in the truck. On demand, neither the Driv¬er, the Helper or the other person could produce the required Transit Permit. The Forester seized the truck and the illegally transported timber and produced the same b











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top