JUDGMENT

B. N. KIRPAL, C.J.I. — Rule.

2. These writ petitions have been filed seeking to chal¬lenge amendments made to the Code of Civil Procedure by the Amendment Act 46 of 1999 and Amendment Act 22 of 2002

3. Writ petition (C) No. 496 of 2002 was filed by the Salem Advocate Bar Association and after notice was issued the petitioner sought leave of this Court to withdraw the writ peti¬tion. By order dated 16th September, 2002, the prayer to withdraw the writ petition was declined, as the petition had been filed in public interest. At the request of the Court, Shri C. S. Vaidya¬nathan, Sr. Advocate assisted b Shri K. V. Vishwanathan, Advocate agreed to assist the Court as Amicus Curiae and they have ren¬dered assistance to the Court for dealing with the case. The Court records its appreciation for the assistance given.

4. In the petitions, the amendments which were sought to be made by the aforesaid Amendment Acts, have been challenged, but we do not find that the said provisions are in any way ultra vires the Constitution. Neither Mr. Vaidyanathan nor any other learned counsel made any submissions to the effect that any of the amendments made were without legislative competence or