SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ori) 437

A.S.NAIDU
Shailendra Kumar Tomatia – Appellant
Versus
Republic of India – Respondent


Advocates:
For Petitioner:Ms./Jagannath Patnaik, P. Panda and B.B. Mohanty
For Opp. party:Mr. S.K. Padhi

JUDGMENT

A. S. NAIDU, J. — The petitioner has filed this Criminal Misc.Case invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court to quash the order dated 10.10.2001 passed by the Special Judge, C.B.I., Bhubaneswar in T.R. No. 151 of 1999 declining to discharge him in the said case as also the order dated 16.1.2003 framing charge against the petitioner for alleged commission of offence under Section 13 (1) (e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

2. The case has a chequered career, inasmuch as the self-same orders impugned in this case were challenged before this Court by the petitioner in a Writ Petition registered as OJC No. 14747 of 2001 under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner had also filed a Criminal Misc.Case before this Court under Section 482 CrPC registered as Cri.M.C. No. 10091 of 2001 for quashing of the very same orders which came up for admission first. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of the Court to withdraw the said Criminal Misc. Case by filing a Memo. to that effect and on the basis of the said Memo., the Criminal Misc.Case (No. 10091 of 2001) was disposed or with the following order :

“Order No.5 dated 14.3.2003 :

Learne




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top