SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ori) 504

PRADIP MOHANTY
Trilochan Jena – Appellant
Versus
Rabindranath Jena – Respondent


JUDGMENT

PRADIP MOHANTY, J. — The unsuccessful defendants-opposite parties before the Court below have filed this petition under Order 43, Rule 1 (r) of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for setting aside the order dated 16.12.2002 passed in Misc. Case No. 369 of 2002 (arising out of Title Suit No. 278 of 2002) of the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kendrapara.

2. The brief fact of the case is that the plaintiff-petitioner filed a petition under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 C.P.C. praying for grant of temporary injunction against the appellants-opposite parties not to do further con¬struction on the suit land as described in the plaint schedule. The respondent-plaintiff filed the suit before the Court below for partition of their ancestral property by metes and bounds. The appellants-opposite parties filed joint rejoinder to the above noted injunction petition denying the averments made therein and further it was asserted that the disputed land fell to their share in an amicable settlement and they are in possession there¬of. The appellants-opposite parties have further stated that they have constructed a pucca house up to roof level over the disputed la





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top