SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Ori) 464

ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H.KAPADIA
Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. — This case is a sad reflection on members of the legal profession and is almost a black spot on the noble profession. The petitioner who belongs to this profession filed a petition styled as “Public Interest Litigation” before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. By the impugned judg¬ment, the High Court dismissed it holding that there was no public interest involved and in fact the petitioner had resorted to black-mailing respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and was caught red-handed accepting 'black-mailing money'. The High Court also noticed that the allegations of unauthorized constructions made in the petition were also not true.

2. Cost of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) which was levied, was directed to be paid to the affected respon¬dent Nos. 6 and 7 before the High Court

3. It is, in fact, a black day for the black robed profes¬sionals, if the allegation, as found by the High Court to be true and which presently appear to be the subject matter of further proceeding in a criminal case, are true. This will leave the members of the legal profession black faced for the black deed of the petitioner who may be as the High Court found a blac




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top