SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ori) 192

P.K.MOHANTY, J.P.MISHRA
Jayadev Swain – Appellant
Versus
Vatsala Raghu – Respondent


Advocates:
For Petitioner:Mr. D. Mishra
For Opp.Party:Addl. Standing Counsel

JUDGMENT

J. P. MISHRA, J. — Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on applicability of Section 5 of the Limitation Act to the Contempt Proceeding.

It is the case of the petitioner that the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the ‘C.A.T.) directed the present opposite parties to reinstate him into service within ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment and within 30 days therefrom to pay all his emolu¬ments with effect from the date on which the petitioner was put off from duty till the day prior to his reinstatement into serv¬ice. The said order was passed on 6.5.1994. Due to non-compliance of the opp.parties the petitioner filed O.J.C. No.14751 of 1998 before this Court as the learned C.A.T. expressed his helpless¬ness to implement his own order. In the writ (O.J.C. No.14751 of 1998), this Court passed the order on 29.11.2000 directing the opp.parties for complying the order of learned Tribunal forthwith and allow the petitioner to joining his former post. Due to non-compliance of order of this Court dt.29.11.2000 the petitioner has filed the present Contempt Proceeding (CONTC No.98 of 2003) on 3.10.2002 i.e. after a period for














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top