SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ori) 727

M.M.DAS
Krushna Ch. Panda – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


ORDER

07.11.2005 — Heard Mr. P. K. Rath, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. P. K. Mohanty, learned Addl. Government Advocate.

The petitioners in the present application call in question the order of resumption of lease passed under Section 3-B of the Orissa Government Land Settlement Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by the Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar. The facts of the case reveal that in W.L. Case No.1781 of 1978 initiated by an application filed by one Lingaraj Rath, after following due procedure as prescribed under the Act and the Rules framed there¬under, the land bearing Plot No.516/1679 under Khata No.489/48 measuring Ac.1.000 was leased out in favour of the said appli¬cant. The name of the said lessee-Lingaraj Rath was recorded in the Record of Right in “Sthitiban” status. While in possession of the said land, the original lessee-Lingaraj Rath sold a part of the same by a registered sale deed to one Subasini Barei. He also sold another portion of the said land to one Jayabana Kumar Singh. The said J. K. Singh, in turn, sold the said land to one Sushama Das. Petitioner No.1- Krushna Chandra Panda has purchased the land to the extent of Ac.0.25 from Smt. Su










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top