Back
2004 Supreme(Ori) 346
2006 (I) OLR (SC) — 436
K. G. BALAKRISHNAN AND DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN, JJ.
Sheikh Ayub... Appellant
Versus
State of M.P.... Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1098 of 2004
(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.3422 of 2004)
Decided on 27th September, 2004.
Headnote:BAIL - Bail granted with condition to deposit Rs. 2,50,000/- which is alleged to have been misappropriated - Also condition for furnishing surety bond for Rs. 50,000/- - Held, direction for deposit not warranted - Direction deleted. (Paras - 3 and 4)
ORDER
Leave granted
2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and counsel for the State.
3. By the impugned order the appellant was granted bail and directed to deposit Rs. 2,50,000 which is alleged to be the amount misappropriated by the appellant. There was also condition for furnishing surety bond for Rs. 50,000/-. In the circumstances of the case, direction to deposit Rs. 2,50,000/- was not warrant¬ed, as part of the conditions for granting bail.
4. Hence, the direction to deposit Rs. 2,50,000/- is deleted and subject to this modification the order passed by the learned Single Judge granting bail is confirmed.
5. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Appeal disposed of.
