SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ori) 764

PRADIP MOHANTY
Syama Takri – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
For Petitioner:M/s. Bijaya Kumar Ragada, Laxminarayan Patel & L. Pani
For Opp.Party:A.S.C.

ORDER

19.12.2006 — This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been implicated in II(a) C.C. No.255 of 2006 of the Court of S.D.J.M., Koraput for the alleged commis¬sion of offence under Section 47(a) of the Bihar & Orissa Excise Act (for short ‘the Act’). It is alleged that on 09.07.2006 at 6.00 p.m. the S.I. of Excise, Pottangi along with other staff, while conducting patrol duty, found the petitioner selling I.D. liquor. On being asked, he failed to produce any licence or authority for the same. Therefore, the S.I. of Excise seized the I.D. liquor (10 litres in quantity) contained in a plastic jerry can, prepared seizure list, arrested the accused-petitioner and forwarded him to the Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl.Standing Counsel.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Assis¬tant Sessions Judge, Koraput has illegally rejected the prayer for bail of the petitioner by applying the provisions of the Act as amended by Act 10 of 2006. According to him, there was no material before the Court that the petitioner is likely to commit similar offence during pendency of the present case or tamper with the evidence. Thou














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top