JUDGMENT

B.P. RAY, J. — The petitioner has preferred this revision challenging the judgment and order of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar in Criminal Appeal No.3 of 1997 confirming the judgment and order of conviction passed by Addl. C.J.M. Bhubanes¬war in S.P.E. Case No.8 of 1989 convicting him U/ss. 420, 468, 471 and 120-B of the I.P.C. and sentencing him to undergo R.I. for two years u/s. 420, IPC; two years u/s. 468 read with Section 471, IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.3000/- under Section 420, I.P.C. and Rs.3000/- for the offence u/s. 468 read with Section 471, IPC and in case of default of payment of fine, the accused is to undergo R.I. for three months more on each count.

2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that one Akhila Chandra Naik was working as an Accountant in the State Bank of India, Panpos Branch, Rourkela. In absence of Branch Manager, he was also performing the duty of Branch Manager. While the said Akhila Chandra Nayak was working as Branch Manager, one Jalandhar Bal was working as Cashier, Srikanta Patnaik as cashier-cum-clerk and one Suleman Kujuru was working as cashier in the said Branch during the period between August, 1984 and December, 1985.